Best and worst cities for meeting your savings goals

Published Mon, May 13 20191:17 PM EDTUpdated Fri, May 17 20192:11 PM EDT

Key Points

Personal finance experts generally recommend that individuals save up at least six months' worth of expenses in case of emergencies.
But where you live can have a big impact on whether you're able to amass that security nest egg, according to a new study from Bankrate.
No matter where you live, you shouldn't give up on becoming more financially secure. Start by seeing where you can cut back, then set up automatic deposits to a savings account.

Thanagon Karaket / EyeEm | EyeEm | Getty Images

If you're having a hard time building a six-month emergency fund, you might want to rethink where you live.

A new study from personal finance website Bankrate took a look at the cities where it is most difficult or easy to stash away cash in case of an emergency.

Bankrate evaluated cities based on housing costs, such as mortgage, insurance and property taxes. It also included other expenses, such as groceries, health care, transportation and utilities.

Memphis came up on the top of the best cities list. The city's residents can save more on an annual basis than they need in their six-month emergency savings fund, according to Bankrate's calculations.

In other cities that rounded out the top five — Cincinnati, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Detroit — it would take an estimated 13 months to build that six-month fund.

Top cities to build an emergency fund

Rank	Metropolitan area	Annual savings potential	Six-month emergency fund goal	Months to achieve savings goal
1	Memphis	$15,761	$15,208	12
2	Cincinnati	$16,801	$17,612	13
3	Cleveland	$14,922	$15,954	13
4	Pittsburgh	$15,376	$16,771	13
5	Detroit	$15,302	$16,915	13

Source: Source: Bankrate.com

In the cities that fell to the bottom of the list, those emergency reserves are much farther out of reach.

In the New York area, for example it would take an estimated 521 months to achieve that savings goal.

And in other cities — San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Jose — it would take an immeasurable amount of time to build up those reserves. That is because residents in those California cities are more likely to be in the red.

Worst cities to build an emergency fund

Rank	Metropolitan area	Annual savings potential	Six-month emergency fund goal	Months to achieve savings goal
46	New York	$695	$30,136	521
47	San Diego	($4,449)	$32,849	N/A
48	Los Angeles	($11,348)	$34,376	N/A
49	San Francisco	($17,283)	$47,159	N/A
50	San Jose	($31,119)	$58,580	N/A

Source: Source: Bankrate.com

Regardless of where you live, you should not give up on reaching your savings goal.

"Set yourself up now for saving that is going to benefit you tomorrow and down the line," said Adrian Garcia, data analyst at Bankrate.

$Fifty-eight percent of Americans have less than $1000 saved$

VIDEO2:0602:06

Fifty-eight percent of Americans have less than $1000 saved

The Exchange

To do that, start by taking several steps.

Create a budget. If you haven't done so yet, sit down and track where your money is going every day, and key areas where you can trim back. "People should think about implementing that now that the economy is good," Garcia said.
Open a savings account. If you don't have an account dedicated to your emergency savings, chances are you won't save. One study from earlier this year found that this is where aspiring savers often fall short. Once you set up the account, be sure to schedule automatic transfers from your checking account.
Be patient. Amassing a six-month emergency fund will take 12 months to 24 months if you're just starting to save, even if you are watching every penny, Garcia said. Stay on track by reminding yourself why you are saving.

To compile its ranking, Bankrate used data from sources including the U.S. Census Bureau, the Council for Community and Economic Research's Cost of Living Index and ATTOM Data Solutions.