Tech

In win for Uber and Lyft, judge strikes down New York City's cruising cap

Key Points
  • A New York state judge struck down a New York City rule limiting how much time drivers for ride-hailing services can spend cruising streets in busy areas of Manhattan without passengers.
  • Judge Lyle Frank of the Supreme Court of State of New York in his decision called the city's cruising cap "arbitrary and capricious."
  • The city introduced the cruising cap as part of a range of measures to curb congestion. It was set to come into effect in February 2020.
Close-up of vertical sign with logos for ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft.
Smith Collection | Gado | Getty Images

A New York state judge on Monday ruled in favor of Uber and Lyft in a lawsuit against New York City, striking down a new rule limiting how much time drivers for ride-hailing services can spend cruising streets in busy areas of Manhattan without passengers.

Judge Lyle Frank of the Supreme Court of State of New York in his decision called the city's cruising cap "arbitrary and capricious."

New York City's Taxi and Limousine Commission passed the rule in August with the aim of reducing traffic congestion in Manhattan, where ride-share vehicles make up close to a third of peak traffic. The commission said it was working on a statement in response to the judgment.

The decision marks a win for Uber and Lyft in their largest U.S. market, where regulators have passed the toughest ride-hailing rules of the country and forced both companies to adjust their business models.

Inside Lyft's self-driving car lab
VIDEO11:1611:16
How Lyft makes self-driving cars inside its level 5 lab

The ruling does not affect New York City's other laws regarding ride-hailing, including a cap on the number of app-based, for-hire cars and minimum pay for the city's 80,000 ride-share drivers.

Uber, which filed the lawsuit in September, welcomed the decision.

"Uber remains committed to fighting for driver flexibility in the face of politically motivated regulations and to stand up for policies that actually combat congestion," the company said in a statement.

Lyft, which filed a separate lawsuit that Frank said was also covered by his Monday decision, said the ruling reaffirmed the regulator created bad policy.

"We look forward to working with state and city leaders to address New York City's transportation challenges with the only true solution to congestion: comprehensive congestion pricing," Lyft said in a statement.

To prepare for the laws, both Uber and Lyft over the past months locked out drivers from their apps at times and in areas of low demand, warning that the rules would prevent drivers from earning money and cut off low-income New Yorkers in remote areas.

Why Uber bet big on Careem
VIDEO10:2010:20
What is Careem?

The cruising cap, intended to come into effect in February 2020, set a limit on how much time drivers of app-based vehicles may drive or wait without passengers in Manhattan south of 96th Street. New York's cruising rate was 41% in 2018. Under the new rule, the maximum would have fallen to 36% in February 2020 and 31% six months later.

Frank on Monday said the city's calculation of the cruising rate should not include the time a driver spends traveling to pick up a passenger who requested a ride.