Cyberattacks against accounting software firm Wolters Kluwer and the City of Baltimore in May showed how the newest wave of malicious hacking can have significant, often...Technologyread more
The European parliamentary election is the second largest democratic exercise in the world.Europe Newsread more
Buybacks have gotten a bad rap from both Republicans and Democrats. But stocks would be trading at a massive discount without them.Marketsread more
Biden had criticized Kim Jong Un as a "dictator" and a "tyrant" at a recent rally in Philadelphia. North Korean state media responded by calling Biden a "fool of low IQ" among...Politicsread more
Fiat Chrysler and France's Renault could soon partner up to take on the sweeping changes to the global auto industry, according to a report in the Financial Times. The...Autosread more
Microsoft shares have gained 133% since November 2015, outperforming a tech "basket of unicorns" over that stretch.Technologyread more
The president's state visit comes amid tensions with carmaker Toyota over potential auto tariffs. Trump has repeatedly threatened Japanese and European carmakers with tariffs.Traderead more
The IRS is about to release a new draft of Form W-4, which will more closely reflect the changes stemming from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. For workers, that means they'll need...Personal Financeread more
The Mega Millions jackpot has spilled over $400 million. It would be the ninth largest winning since the game began in 2002.Personal Financeread more
Trump was speaking at a meeting of Japanese business leaders in Tokyo during his state visit to Japan on Saturday.Marketsread more
The biggest U.S. gasoline price surge in years is running out of steam just in time for the start of the summer driving season.Energyread more
President Barack Obama took to the podium Wednesday to highlight one of America's deepest economic problems: inequality.
Inequality, he said, is "morally wrong" and "bad economics."
There is no question that inequality is disturbingly high. Even Rupert Murdoch said so earlier this month, warning in a tweet that America is becoming a "class society."
But setting aside the tiresome, partisan screaming on both sides about the consequences of inequality and how to solve it, the renewed discussion of inequality is flawed by a disregard for actual data.
(Read more: 'Stop bashing the rich,' says London's mayor)
In his speech Obama said, "growth is more fragile and recessions are more frequent in countries with greater inequality."
He added that indebted households spend less, while "concentrated wealth is less likely to result in consumer spending," since the rich spend a smaller share of their income.
Obama's comments reflect a growing assumption that our current economic problems—high unemployment and weak consumer demand—are rooted in a sudden surge in inequality.
Business Insider's Henry Blodget, in an otherwise well-reasoned call for a higher minimum wage, makes the case that the "overlords" are not sharing enough wealth with the "serfs."
"When inequality gets bad enough, serfs can't afford to buy products from overlords," he wrote. "The serfs are tapped out," and "the overlords are responding by cutting costs (firing serfs) to increase profits."
(Read more: Richest 1% earn biggest share since Roaring '20s)
Joseph Stiglitz has been writing for years about how rising inequality is a direct cause of our slower growth. "Politicians typically talk about rising inequality and the sluggish recovery as separate phenomena, when they are in fact intertwined," he wrote in The New York Times. "Inequality stifles, restrains and holds back our growth."
The trouble with this analysis is that inequality has been higher when economic growth is strong. In 2007, unemployment was under 4.5 percent. But the top 1 percent of earners controlled 23.5 percent of income (including capital gains). Today, unemployment is 7.3 percent. But the top 1 percent control a smaller share of income—specifically 22.46 percent.
The previous spike in inequality was during the boom in 1999 and 2000. It declined during the 2000 recession and declined again during the financial crisis in 2009.
(Read more: Millionaires grow cautious about the market)
This is not to diminish the importance or level of inequality. Inequality in America is high—both in wealth and income terms, and relative to other countries. And the current split between the haves and have-mores has no doubt grown in recent years as the "asset rich" have benefited from easy money from the Federal Reserve.
But inequality is still below where it was during the good times. And this shows that inequality may more of a by-product of strong stock markets, rather than a cause of economic decline.
—By CNBC's Robert Frank. Follow him on Twitter .