Some Apple employees have become disillusioned with the group's culture, where some have thrived while others feel sidelined.Technologyread more
Biden has shown staying power at the top of a jammed Democratic field even as polling numbers for Sanders, Warren and Harris wax and wane.2020 Electionsread more
The FDIC on Tuesday votes to approve a five-agency revision of the post-crisis regulation known as the Volcker Rule.Financeread more
The yield curve is the only economic indicator pointing to a recession, according to Credit Suisse.Marketsread more
Stocks slipped on Tuesday as investors digested a sharp rebound from a strong sell-off last week.US Marketsread more
With the official launch of the Apple Card, Goldman Sachs has embarked on a multi-decade journey to becoming a leader in consumer banking, CEO David Solomon said.Financeread more
For investors still haunted by last week's monster sell-off, the market's comeback is set to last, according to J.P. Morgan's quant guru.Marketsread more
The move comes as Facebook continues to grapple with its privacy practices and lawmakers' scrutiny over how it uses personal data to display ads. But it will probably won't...Technologyread more
An under-the-radar hedge fund is ruling the industry with a nearly 30% return this year so far, and it's more than doubling its bet on gold.Marketsread more
The Apple Card is more secure because users get a one-time-use number in the Wallet app, says the president of Mastercard's North American operations.Technologyread more
The National Rifle Association is turning to old stock footage of Dana Loesch, their former spokeswoman, to rally supporters in the wake of the recent mass shootings and...Politicsread more
Apple filed a motion on Thursday to vacate a California judge's order compelling the company to create software that would allow FBI agents to access an iPhone used in the San Bernardino, California, terrorist attacks.
The government has said Apple must help because there is no way to get at the data on a smartphone used by San Bernardino shooter Rizwan Farook without the company engineering a special operating system. The company said, among other things, that the judge's order violates the company's First Amendment rights.
"No court has ever granted the government power to force companies like Apple to weaken its security systems to facilitate the government's access to private individuals' information," the tech giant said in a release.
On the First Amendment, Apple said that being forced to write a new set of code reflecting the government's opinion of privacy (not the company's) constitutes a violation of its rights against compelled speech and viewpoint discrimination.
Apple also said the demand violates its Fifth Amendment right to be free from arbitrary deprivation of liberties "in that it would conscript Apple to develop software that undermines the security mechanisms of its own products," the company said in a fact sheet about the motion.
In a conference call with reporters, Apple executives contended that the government is asking the court to order the company to do something that has not been authorized by Congress — something that the Department of Justice and the executive branch has shied away from.
In fact, the executives contended that the question of whether the company should be forced to create an operating system specifically for government use is a political question — not a legal one.
In its motion, Apple detailed its "substantial assistance" in the government's investigation, including furnishing "valuable informal assistance." The company, however, charged that the FBI made an error in changing the account's iCloud password, and so foreclosed the chance of accessing its data through other means.
"Had the FBI consulted Apple first, this litigation may not have been necessary," the brief said.
The executives said on the call that they have heard from a number of companies and interest groups supporting Apple's arguments, and so they expect a robust amount of amicus briefs.
MIcrosoft's announcement said: "Put simply, we do not believe that courts should seek to resolve issues of 21st-century technology with law that was written in the era of the adding machine. We need 21st-century laws that address 21st-century technology issues. And we need these laws to be written by Congress."
Forty-six percent of American respondents in a national online Reuters/Ipsos poll said they support Apple's decision to oppose a federal court order demanding that it unlock the phone. On the other hand, 35 percent said they disagreed with the company and 20 percent said they did not know, according to poll results released Wednesday.
— Reuters contributed to this article.