President Donald Trump will throw himself fully into his battle to overhaul U.S. trade deals this week with special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation — mostly — behind him.
The president won the White House in large part by pledging to crack down on foreign trade abuses and rework international agreements to boost U.S. manufacturing and protect American workers. The conclusion of Mueller's probe — and the Justice Department's decision not to charge the president with obstruction of justice — comes at a pivotal time in Trump's push to follow through on a campaign priority ahead of his 2020 re-election bid.
Trump will try to rework U.S. trade relationships on more than one front in the coming weeks and months. He not only aims to strike a new deal with China, but also wants Congress to ratify a revised North American trade deal. A flurry of activity on the trade front starts this week:
Trump has railed against China, Mexico and Canada's trade practices for years and sees the criticism as a central part of his political appeal. He now stands closer than ever to reworking trade relationships with all three countries as he looks for signature policy achievements to promote on the 2020 campaign trail.
Some trade policy observers believe the end of Mueller's probe — and Barr's letter saying the special counsel concluded that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election — put Trump in a stronger position in talks with China. Of course, the president will still face some legal questions moving forward: Democrats continue to push for the release of Mueller's full report, while probes both inside and outside of Congress are still looking into Trump's administration and businesses.
Potential pitfalls await the president on every front of his trade policy push. The U.S. and China still have a long way to go toward agreeing to a deal — and Beijing appears unlikely to meet some of the Trump administration's demands.
Trump, who is fixated on reducing the U.S. trade deficit with China, wants Beijing to buy "double or triple" the $1.2 trillion in U.S. products it previously offered to purchase. It is also unclear how fully China will address U.S. concerns about intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers. Bipartisan lawmakers including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have cited the issues as the most important points in the China talks, and have signaled they could resist a deal that does adequately address them. Republican senators such as Marco Rubio, R-Fla., have been vocal about cracking down on Chinese trade abuses.
Trump also said last week that he could leave tariffs on China in place for a "substantial period of time," even after the world's two largest economies reach an agreement. Reports have indicated that China threatened to pull back on certain concessions if the U.S. did not remove tariffs as part of a deal.
At the same time, Congress has started to scrutinize the terms of Trump's North American trade deal revisions. The House hearing Tuesday will try to assess how effective the U.S. has been in enforcing previous trade agreements, said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, an Oregon Democrat who leads the Ways and Means Committee's trade subcommittee.
Blumenauer told CNBC that he has "some reservations" about a provision that would shield pharmaceutical companies making certain drugs from competition for 10 years, among other concerns lawmakers have about the deal.
"These are areas that we want to zero in on," he said. "There are questions about labor enforcement, questions about environmental protections."
"I want to find out if NAFTA 2.0 is any better" than the original deal, he added. The agreement went into effect in 1994.
While Trump has pushed for swift ratification of the agreement, Blumenauer said the timeline for Congress to approve an agreement is "fluid." He noted that House Democrats are "not going to be bound" by "artificial deadlines."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — who will play a large role in deciding whether the agreement can get through Congress — has also expressed skepticism about it.
The high-stakes trade decisions in Washington do not end there. Trump has also accused Europe of unfair trade practices, and sees tariffs on European cars as one means to address them.
The move would come with its own political risks. Trump's tariff policy has sparked more backlash from Republicans on Capitol Hill than just about anything the president has done since he took office.
GOP lawmakers have in particular questioned the national security justification the Trump administration used to put duties on steel and aluminum imports last year. A group of lawmakers from both major parties led by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., wrote to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross last week asking him to publish the auto tariff report and answer questions about how he came to his conclusions.
Some GOP senators have already signaled they will oppose auto tariffs if Trump levies them.
"Section 232 is a vital trade remedy tool for genuine national security threats, but misusing it on autos is harmful for Ohio, its economy & auto manufacturing in our state," Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, said in a written statement. "I urge the administration to make public its recent report justifying its rationale in this case."
Last week, Trump told Fox Business Network that he wants European automakers to build their cars in the U.S. Still, he may not exactly agree with the rationale his administration would use to levy the duties on automobiles.
Asked if he thought car imports threatened national security, the president answered, "Well, no." He said "what poses a national security risk is our balance sheet," in reference to trade deficits with the European Union.