- As battles over Britain's final Brexit proposals continue to cause divisions within Theresa May's government and the U.K. parliament, support for the British prime minister and her leadership is coming from an unlikely source — Europe.
- Divisions between so-called 'Brexiteers' and 'Remainers' are rife in the U.K.'s parliament
- Battle lines drawn between politicians who favor a hard separation from the rest of the European Union, and those that want a "soft" Brexit in which the U.K. stays roughly aligned to the continent.
As battles over Britain's final Brexit proposals continue to cause divisions within Theresa May's government and the U.K. parliament, support for the British prime minister and her leadership is coming from an unlikely source — Europe.
Divisions between so-called 'Brexiteers' and 'Remainers' are rife in the U.K.'s parliament, with battle lines drawn between politicians who favor a hard separation from the rest of the European Union, and those that want a "soft" Brexit in which the U.K. stays roughly aligned to Europe in terms of trade and regulations, making a post-Brexit relationship easier.
Stuck between these warring factions, Prime Minister May has erred towards the latter, aiming for a softer divorce from the bloc. Outlining her plans for the U.K.'s relationship with the EU after March 2019, May's "Chequers plan" shows her favoring close regulatory alignment with the EU's single market in order to facilitate trade after Brexit.
Setting out such an arrangement is the easy part, however, with the other 27 EU members having to approve any final deal, as well as members of the U.K. parliament having to approve any final Brexit deal, also known as the "withdrawal arrangement." Although a group of Brexiteers have mounted a challenge to May's plan, other members of parliament have rallied around her. For her part, May has said it's her deal, or "no deal."
Christopher Peel, chief investment officer at Tavistock Investments, told CNBC that the next few weeks would be critical in the Brexit timeline.
"Both sides of the U.K. political divide remain split on their version of Brexit. Theresa May has struggled to find a common ground, but she will probably survive long enough to see out the negotiating process to its conclusion," Peel said Wednesday.
With the clock ticking and the March 29 exit date drawing near, both the U.K. and EU want to have a deal on their future relations in place by the time a two-day summit happens in mid-October.
Outstanding issues yet to be resolved include trade and security and — perhaps the biggest stumbling block — the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland that will become the U.K.'s land border with the EU after Brexit.
Ironically, May's Brexit plan is turning into a harder sell at home than it is in the EU.
Many pro-Brexit politicians at home are rebelling against May's deal, saying it does not allow the U.K. to strike out on its own to forge its own trading relationships with the rest of the world. Many of these MPs are threatening to oppose the Chequers plan in any final vote, as have the opposition Labour party.
"May has got in the middle between negotiating on behalf of the U.K. with Europe and her own party, which is basically trying to get rid of her, or threatening to get rid of her at every step, so it's a kind of 'muddle-through' (situation) for Brexit," Kieran Calder, head of Equity Research, Asia at Union Bancaire Privee, told CNBC on Thursday.
Meanwhile, in the EU, national leaders appear to be aware of how fragile May's position is, and consequently appear to have mollified their position towards her — or at least look like they will try to meet her halfway.
All eyes are on Salzburg in Austria where May met her EU counterparts on Wednesday evening and Thursday. Ahead of the summit, May called on EU leaders to drop "unacceptable" demands in the Brexit negotiation. She will need all the goodwill and support she can get from leaders there though several have signaled their willingness to compromise.
Nonetheless, the real drama — and battle lines — are at home for May. "While this (the summit in Austria) suggests a focus on the negotiations between the EU and the U.K., the process is by now occupied mainly with selling the eventual deal at home in Westminster," Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at Teneo Intelligence, said in a note Tuesday.
"There is still no serious discussion about the all-important withdrawal agreement in the U.K. Instead, May's Tories continue to fight over the Chequers plan which will, in reality, never see the light of the day. As a result, decades of an intense and mostly theoretical discourse on Europe will come to a head within just a handful of days, once the eventual deal forces every individual MP to decide how to cast their vote," he added.
Nickel said that while support for a deal should still be the base case, "the risk of rejection remains very real," at 40 percent.
The Northern Ireland border issue is perhaps the most divisive and politically toxic element to Brexit discussions.
There is little political appetite to see Northern Ireland treated differently to the rest of the U.K., despite the fact it is set to become the U.K.'s only land border with the EU and there is a strong desire on both sides to keep goods and people moving freely between the countries without a "hard" border.
Ahead of Thursday's informal EU summit, the EU's chief negotiator in Brexit talks, Michel Barnier, said Tuesday that the bloc was ready to improve its proposals on how to resolve the Irish border issue.
The EU's "backstop" plan (a plan that's applicable as a last resort, as a result of 'no deal') has suggested that Northern Ireland could stay within the EU's customs union, allowing people and goods to continue to move freely, but the U.K. has vetoed that proposal.
Opposition to such a move lies in the fact that the EU's external border would effectively then be drawn down the middle of the Irish Sea, at least symbolically challenging the unity of the U.K.
Any plan that sees Northern Ireland "separated," in terms of regulation, from the U.K. is unpopular in both Westminster and among Northern Irish unionists.
"What we cannot accept is seeing Northern Ireland carved away from the United Kingdom's customs territory because, regardless of where the checks would be, what that would mean is that it would be a challenge to our constitutional and economic integrity," May told reporters on Wednesday evening.
Speaking after a meeting with EU foreign ministers, Barnier told reporters that a legally operational "backstop" that respects Britain's sovereignty was required. But he said border checks, for goods and citizens, needed to be "de-dramatized" and that the meeting in October would be "the moment of truth."
As Barnier signaled that EU leaders could pave the way for a deal to resolve the Northern Ireland issue, sterling rallied to an eight-week high against the euro, making the euro worth 88.64 pence, although inflation data also boosted the pound. Thursday's summit is seen as a make-or-break event for the pound. One foreign exchange strategist, Jane Foley, remarked in early September that sterling is so volatile it could slump or surge in the next few months.
The U.K. prime minister's key allies in Northern Ireland, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), have already poured water on Barnier's comments, however.
Nigel Dodds, the deputy leader of the DUP – a party staunchly defensive of Northern Ireland's position as part of the U.K. – said Wednesday that Barnier's comments "still means a border down the Irish Sea, although with different kinds of checks."
"The fact is that both Theresa May and the Labour Party have said no British Prime Minister could accept such a concept. It is not just unionists who object," he added. The DUP, and most politicians in London, refuse to countenance any trade or border proposals that would mean Northern Ireland is separated from the U.K. or more aligned to Ireland.
Mujtaba Rahman, Eurasia Group's managing director of Europe research, said Wednesday in a note that the Irish border "remains the biggest stumbling block" to the Brexit process.
"Although widely interpreted as a new development, Michel Barnier's intervention yesterday is consistent with the EU27's longstanding view — that there is flexibility on the design and location of customs checks, as long as checks take place.
"While Barnier's warmer words are welcome in London, Whitehall officials concede that the two sides are still 'miles apart.'"